Subscribe Now and Get Discount 10%
Be the first to learn about our latest trends
Criminal Justice Administration
Name
Instructor
Institution
Date
Criminal Justice Administration Capstone
The coordination of the different agencies of the criminal justice system makes a very varied and incorporating system. This has made the existing structure of law implementation in the United States to be extremely multifaceted yet unsophisticated in its form. Every agency is exceptional in its specific set and in most cases; it has its specific areas of accountability that put it separately from the other agencies. The diverse law enforcement constituents that structure criminal justice system are the Local, Federal, and State agencies. Every agency in every level may function autonomously of every other, but sometimes essential agencies may combine means so as to fight crime. Every level encompasses its particular fixed of guidelines, measures, and accountabilities in view of jurisdictional guidelines. Therefore, this paper will examine the organizational structures and operations of every agency consistent with its jurisdictional obligations and execution accountabilities. It will offer a contrast between every of agencies indicating the connections and dissimilarities of the management, organization, operational, and administration functions in every agency. It will similarly address the features and leadership accountabilities in relation to every executive level.
Federal administrations are those agencies that operate in an all-inclusive jurisdiction and administer the intense criminalities committed in contradiction of the government. They comprise four major agencies. These agencies are Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, United State Marshals services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosive. However, there are also more than ten other law enforcement agencies that have federal enforcement officers. Their core function includes custom and boarder protection, immigration and custom enforcement, secret services, transportation security administration, investigation of crime, in addition to the apprehension of supposed criminals. They are not restricted to the boundaries of the United States but they can control even outside. The directors of these agencies get selected by the president of the United State and they answer back to the Attorney General of the United State.
In the United State, in law enforcement, local police agency constitutes for the biggest numbers of officers. According to Grant & Terry (2008), the main work for local police agencies is to examine and resolve crimes that take place in their authority. The authority that they service is in relation to their local municipality in their national. After arrest is made, the local agencies perform fingerprinting and mug-shots. A police chief who gets selected by the mayor heads the local police department and to control crime, the local agencies function with the local law execution within their authority. Included in local police is sheriff’s department that offers police services at county level. Sheriff’s department makes up the county agencies. The sheriff department gets operated by a sheriff who gets designated by the municipality. The sheriff as the head gets in charge of the deputy sheriffs to accomplish the task and responsibility of police officials. The principal accountability of the sheriff department according to Grant & Terry (2008) is to perform court-ordered directive and function the county correctional or confinement services. A lot of of the bigger sheriff’s officer’s center principally on the roles and tasks of the correctional facility.
State agencies were got recognized to handle national traffic laws and accidents. The principal effort of the state law execution agency is to put into effect the traffic laws and investigate traffic, accidents, or calamities covering the whole nation. More, Vito & Walsh, (2012) indicate that the state agencies’ officers center on highway traffic and to execute synchronization chances with local agencies to set to haste traps in city restrictions.
The different levels of law enforcement have all mutual objectives of defending residents and to put into effect laws. However, they do vary from one agency to another in the feature of the phase of criminality a criminal may get held doing. For all criminal laws, the local agencies officers are the initial law enforcement agent. To aid the local agency offices to reinforce the effort of the officers, it is staffed with an overabundance of noncombatant support members. As opposed to officers allocated to federal and state agencies, the local department’s officers get restricted to the authority they are allocated to.
As the local agencies, state agencies encompass the identical law enforcement resourcefulness, but on the state level. State agencies, on the front lines, put into effect state, local, and federal laws, and are frequently found implementing state civil, traffic, and criminal laws. The state agencies authority embraces the whole state unlike the local agencies, but get restricted to the national compared to federal agencies.
Federal agencies are alike in the role and administrative control of local and state agencies. However, the Federal administration has systematized federal agencies to regulate particular areas of criminality all over the nation. Before 2011, the federal agencies fell in one of two administrations, the Department of Treasury or the Department of Justice. According to Schmalleger (2012), it was after terrorist attack that took place in 2011 that the Homeland Security Act of 2002 restructured federal agencies in the Department of Homeland Security.
The FBI manages collecting offence reports from every federal, state, and local agency and brings them together to form the UCR. Afterward, to every agency, they draft the implications to successfully bring about modification and purpose in law implementation (Schmalleger, 2012). To the state, local and federal agency, the FBI offers training for new practices and tactics to law implementation and they as well offer sustenance with offense labs to federal and local state agencies. As a result, apart from it is on a federal level of authority, the FBI performs in a related stuff as the state agencies of law implementation. This indicates that the jurisdictional duty of FBI is to all fifty countries of the United States; whereas state jurisdictions get limited to the borders of their specific nation (More, Vito, & Walsh, 2012). The federal agencies answer back to State’s chief executive officer or the United States’ president, but the state agencies answer back to governors.
As for the other federal agencies, every agency gets placed to regulate particular units of the unlawful deeds all over the nation and outside. Certain organizations for instance the Drug Enforcement Agency are particular to criminalities for example drugs or defense particulars. The Drug Enforcement Agency is particular to regulate prohibited trading and the usage of controlled element, whereas agencies for instance the United Stated Customs and Border Patrol are particular to migration and custom jurisdictions comprising the United States boundaries.
The United State Marshals Services is accountable for implementing warranties and management of federal defendants, witnesses, and convicts (Schmalleger, 2012). Federal witness defense program is one leading entity known of the United State Marshals Services. This program defends witnesses that give evidence against most important illegal entities of prearranged criminality or other national crimes. The United State Marshals Services can get related with the department of Sheriff on the local agency of the state jurisdiction, apart from that the United State Marshals Services governs convicts across the whole of the United States.
In the local, state, and federal agencies, leadership are comparable in some way. The state and local agencies officers are quasi-military and they wear uniforms. On the other hand, the FBI agents do not wear uniform and functions in an occupational arrangement. The FBI officers additionally have positions in the department but they do not have ranks. A civilian is in charge of the local but a uniformed police officer in the state police gives directions to the government to designate the officer. The civilian gets selected by the mayor and the state police regularly commanded by a superintendent who gets selected with an endorsement from the state Senate by the governor. Equivalent as the state and local police the position of the administrator of the Federal Bureau of Investigation president offers to a person. The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation must respond to the Attorney General of the United States but unlike local and state of does not respond to a political figure since it falls in the Department of Justice.
More than any other agent, according to a census by the Bureau of Justice Statistics in 2008, local agencies are many across the country than state and federal agencies (Reaves, 2011). This fact took account of housing police, transit police, and school resource officers. In many law enforcement agencies they employ only one full time officer apart from departments like the New York Police Department which have more than 40,000 full-time officers (Reaves, 2011). There are about 13,000 specialty units in the local, state and federal agencies and every unit has a particular obligation to aid different parts of the country.
Lastly, the diverse levels of law execution from local agencies to federal agencies permit a person to assimilate in to acquire information of the organization, administrative processes, and roles. When there are limitations on law implementation, this permits for the centering unlawful doings in their authority. Crossing point with other agencies on diverse levels permits any law execution agency to completely benefit on the whole agency’s control and means. For example, all local, state and federal agencies of law enforcement make use of the UCR and crime labs. To defend and serve in the best interest of the public of the United States, every agency organization, the value and principles get shared.
Every agency of law execution executes a related yet unique duty. Every agency handles law enforcement undertakings, yet every undertaking has its specific distinctive state of affairs. At the local agency, law execution staffs are the leading officers of defending and aiding the inhabitants of the United States on an everyday and extremely noticeable basis. The state agencies deal with implementing national laws on the highways and roads in the countries’ authority, together with defending the countries possessions and properties. On the other hand, federal agencies deal with the defense of state properties, together with the investigation of national offenses and upkeep roles within. Every agency similarly offers sustenance and help to every other agency when desired.
For the reason of the characteristic nature of the organization’s assignments, the agency staffing, and tasks are comparable yet diverse. Every agency requires executive staff together with fiscal and financial staffs, relying on the assignment of the agency. Additionally, every agency further requires a correctional staff, an investigational persons, and forensics persons. However, from the above analysis, one major variation among the local, state and federal agencies is that the state and local law execution officers are the persons on the streets, in interaction with the community on an everyday basis.
References
Grant, H.B., & Terry, K.J. (2008). Law Enforcement in the 21st Century (2nd Ed.). Allyn &Bacon: Pearson Education.
More. H. W., Vito, G. F., & Walsh, W. F. (2012). Organizational behavior and management in law enforcement (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reaves, B. A. (2011). Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2008. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/csllea08.pdf.
Schmalleger, F. (2012). Criminology Today: An Integrative Introduction (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.